Rendező:
Alfred HitchcockForgatókönyvíró:
Joseph StefanoOperatőr:
John L. RussellZeneszerző:
Bernard HerrmannSzereplők:
Anthony Perkins, Vera Miles, John Gavin, Janet Leigh, Martin Balsam, John McIntire, Simon Oakland, Frank Albertson, Patricia Hitchcock, Vaughn Taylor (több)Streaming (3)
Tartalmak(1)
A főnöke megbízza Mariont, a csinos, fiatal titkárnőt, hogy tegyen be negyvenezer dollárt a bankba, a nő azonban lelép a pénzzel. A szeretőjével, Sammel akar élni. Az esőben eltéved, és letér a főútról. Végül az elhanyagolt Bates Motelben száll meg. Norman, a tulajdonos előzékenyen fogadja, ám az anyja rossz néven veszi ezt. Még aznap este Mariont valaki lemészárolja a fürdőszobában. Sam és a lány testvére, Lila magánnyomozót fogadnak, hogy keresse meg Mariont. Arbogast eljut a motelba, ám ő is gyilkosság áldozata lesz. (Cinemax)
(több)Videók (3)
Recenziók (10)
Téves a Psycho filmet egy műfaj képviselőjeként értékelni, vagy mint olyan filmet, amely alatt a néző néhány csillag erejéig félt. A Psycho film megérdemli, hogy úgy értékeljük, mint a filmművészet lehetőségeinek bemutatóját. Alfred Hitchcock zseniális kreativitásának bemutatójaként. És ezen az úton haladva csak egy következtetésre lehet jutni: a Psycho nem film, hanem szuperfilm. Először is van ez a film, és csak ezután vannak filmek, amelyeket néhány csillaggal lehet értékelni aszerint, hogy mennyire jók. ___ Tegyük fel, hogy egy festő ecsetjének X lehetősége van a mozgásra, dőlésszögre a vászonhoz, intenzitásra megérinteni a vásznat. A filmrendezésnek, munkának a filmes folyamatokkal és nézővel is megvannak a maga lehetőségei. Hitchcock megszelídítette ezt az X számú lehetőséget, amelyekkel más filmesek dolgoztak, mosolyogva zsonglőrködött velük, és megteremtette az XYZ lehetőségek új palettáját. A filmkészítés tudomány. Ki és mikor lesz nála nagyobb filmes feltaláló?
()
When I saw Psycho in a packed cinema, it evoked more laughter than horror. It wasn't laughter of relief in response to something shocking, but in response to some now unintentionally funny dialogue and situations towards the end of the film. Times change and what worked 40 or more years ago doesn't have the same power today. I appreciate Hitchcock's great surprise for the uninitiated (the famous shower scene and its completely unexpected consequence) and the shocking twist. The black-and-white cinematography is also excellent, and the realities of where the film takes place are impressive. But overall, Hitchcock's most famous film didn't leave a deep mark on me. Just because it was made by the great Master himself, I won't waste a full rating. From a historical point of view, five stars. From a purely subjective point of view and overall emotional experience, a decent four stars.
()
It’s such a shame that this film’s twist is so profane today, the experience would have been much greater without knowing it. What surprised me a little is that it was the bathroom scene the one that became the most famous, I think the one of the attack at the stairs is a lot better – it’s one of the best and most terrifying attacks on film I’ve ever seen. Basically, it manages to precisely capture the instant between the reveal of the attacker and the attack itself, thus saving both the moment of surprise and the moment of tension. It’s like when, in a fraction of a second, you notice that the person who has just started running towards you is holding a knife. Yeah, and before I forget, Psycho made me realise what is that thing that often bothers me in old films, that characters driving a car shot from the front turn the steering wheel too much :-) 90%
()
A cinematic delicacy that belongs to the golden treasury of world cinema. Even if Alfred Hitchcock had made nothing else, he would still deserve a monument carved in marble. The shower scene or the fall down the stairs are, for me, symbols of perfect direction, while the slowly turning chair in the basement symbolizes horror as a distinct genre. Anthony Perkins is excellent, and he never managed to surpass his performance and essentially remained trapped in the role of the deranged Norman. The ingredients in this film are balanced so well that it became a delicacy... The extraordinarily impressive music is also worth mentioning. Overall impression: 100%.
()
I'll preface this with the fact that it's a better 3 stars. Where this movie wins is the music. I watched it in the cinema, with my classmates around me, and quite a few of them flinched in horror at the murder of the private eye. But that's mostly because of the music. Unfortunately, it didn’t fire me up, which is definitely a shame. And the other problem was that it was clear to me almost from the beginning what the ending was going to be. But I think this film belongs in the "must-see" column, so I don't regret going to see it at all as part of Project 100. But the last scene (before the credits jump in), that was really awesome.
()
Hirdetés