Rendező:
Danis TanovićForgatókönyvíró:
Danis TanovićOperatőr:
Walther Vanden EndeSzereplők:
Branko Djuric, René Bitorajac, Filip Šovagović, Georges Siatidis, Serge-Henri Valcke, Katrin Cartlidge, Bogdan Diklic, Simon Callow, Primoz Petkovsek (több)Tartalmak(1)
A történet egy bosnyák és egy szerb katonáról, Cikiról és Ninoról szól, akik 1993-ban, a boszniai háború alatt az ellenséges frontvonalak közé, a "senkiföldjére" szorulnak. Ciki és Nino megpróbál kiutat találni a bizarr helyzetből, amiben az ENSZ egy kéksisakos őrmestere is segíteni próbál, annak ellenére, hogy parancsot kapott a be nem avatkozásra. Az eseményeket a sajtó képviselői is izgalommal figyelik, amitől az egész nemzetközi üggyé válik. A konfliktus résztvevői között feszült várakozás alakul ki, a világsajtó a végkifejletre vár. Eközben Ciki és Nino elkeseredetten próbálják menteni életüket, és kitérni a háború esztelensége elől. (Budapest Film)
(több)Videók (2)
Recenziók (8)
I can tell a good anti-war film by how it affects me. If the message doesn't hit me hard, it's just a waste of financial resources. The creators of this film didn't waste any, and the message hit hard. I could hardly find a better depiction of the senselessness of war. There is no doubt that soldiers essentially function as a group of armed tourists, and although there are capable and determined people among them, their leadership cancels them out. If the story didn't take place outdoors, it could have been considered a chamber film. However, the story was so intense that it easily beats many so-called blockbusters. / "Maybe you could get a close of them clearing the mine." / Lesson learned: There are situations you can't get out of, even if you tried so hard you shit yourself.
()
The absurdity of the Bosnian-Serbian conflict is matched by the overall mood of this remarkable film. It would be wrong to accuse it of having a simple plot and uniform characters. Danis Tanović best portrayed the absurdity of the whole situation on these very characters. No Man's Land is not a film intended to appeal through bombastic war spectacle or profound philosophical contemplations. That is because it revolves around a Serbian soldier versus a Bosnian soldier, the indecisiveness of the UN troops, who seem more focused on "maintaining the war" rather than peacekeeping, and an investigative journalist, driven to get her story at any cost. If the term "Balkan conflict" means anything to you, you can understand that war is folly, even if you are not an adamant pacifist.
()
I wondered what kind of film could have walked away with Amélie's Oscar. Now I know, and I have to say I haven't seen a film with such a well-written story in a long time. A brilliant black-humour look at the war in Bosnia, the media and the embarrassing role of UNPROFOR. A truly brilliant plot and performances and I bow to director Tanovic for his first feature. I watched it at the SFS and I hope it gets a wider distribution so more people will see it.
()
In every aspect, an extraordinary film, with a well-developed, fully functional script, meticulous direction, casting, and outstanding performances. Along with Peter Kosminsky's Warriors, it is the most impressive and valuable depiction of the Bosnian conflict. The absurdity of war is portrayed through the tragicomic and utterly pointless confrontation of two enemy soldiers between the front lines next to an armed mine, on which lies the body of a third, severely injured man. Despite the light, satirical tone, there is no happy ending... Overall impression 95%.
()
The traditional Balkan school can be found in the style of Danis Tanović. The art of a tragicomic situation that balances on the edge of concrete and metaphor, to display a bleak whole, is typical especially for Emir Kusturica, but Tanović seconds him more than proficiently. At first, the humorous paradox of three men who find themselves in caught between the battle lines of Serbs and Bosnians grows into absurd dimensions of personal and super-personal tragedy, which the "Western" world, immersed in its quasi-messianic role, is unable to comprehend, let alone resolve. No Man's Land can be perceived as a brilliantly filmed intimate drama, but it is far better to see it as a statement of the illogicality of one conflict and the inability of Western civilization to be empathetic. The dismal ending is on par with the strongest moments of Kusturica’s filmography, and it is precisely this fact that makes me give it full marks even after the rather dull introduction. One should not only see No Man's Land, but one should also try to empathize with what one who understands more than the reporters of the mass media tells us without unnecessary nationalist passions.
()
Hirdetés