Forgatókönyvíró:
Jeff BuhlerOperatőr:
Laurie RoseZeneszerző:
Christopher YoungSzereplők:
Jason Clarke, Amy Seimetz, John Lithgow, Jeté Laurence, Hugo Lavoie, Lucas Lavoie, Alyssa Brooke Levine, Sonia Maria Chirila, Bailey Thain (több)Streaming (2)
Tartalmak(1)
A nagy hatású Stephen King regény alapján készült film Dr. Louis Creedet (Jason Clarke) követi, aki feleségével, Rachellel (Amy Seimetz) és két kisgyermekükkel Bostonból kiköltözik vidékre, Maine-be. Louis a család új otthona mellett, az erdő mélyén felfedez egy titkos és rejtélyes temetkezési helyet. Amikor beüt a tragédia, Louis segítséget kér a fura szomszédtól, Jud Crandalltől (John Lithgow), és ezzel egy olyan veszélyes láncreakciót indít el, amely felszabadít egy kifürkészhetetlen gonosz erőt, és ez szörnyű következményekkel jár... (UIP-Duna Film)
(több)Videók (10)
Recenziók (14)
Koncepció nélküli rutin, amely valószínűleg a kritikát nélkülöző popcornos tinédzsereknek fog tetszeni (van benne ijesztgetés és vérontás is), de a téma rajongóinak és a műfaj gondolkodó rajongóinak csalódást fog okozni vagy felbosszantja őket. A filmnek vannak erős pillanatai (a kislány átöleli édesanyját) és helyenként szép a látványvilága (temetkezési hely), de ugyanakkor ízig-vérig buta, és főleg hiányzik belőle a rendező víziója "egy egyedi témának megfelelően érdekes filmes feldolgozást szeretnék adni". A színészek rendben vannak, a családi harmónia és a fagyos környezet kezdeti hangulata működik, de később a filmben olyan dolgok kezdenek történni, amelyek kizökkentik a filmet.
()
If any of Stephen King’s books are made into a movie, usually, the result cannot be bad. Except, maybe, when the filming is made by a bungler, the result can be quite a screw-up. What sometimes happens is that an average movie is made from a quality theme, but that depends on the abilities of the makers – or the lack thereof. Pet Sematary, for example, was not filmed for the first time, but I cannot say that there is anything different or unique about it. I think that it is a standard horror movie, which does not even make you scared, because the thought of fear is somewhat turned upside down. Also, it is kind of boring and without the last half an hour, I would probably rate it with even less stars.
()
I'm not an uncritical King fan, yet I gave the new version of Pet Sematary a chance. Sadly, King adaptations will probably never get out from under their shadows again. It's still all about there being one better film for every twenty crap ones, and really only rarely is there a work worthy of the viewer's remembering. That's how I fondly remember Carrie and Misery. A lot of the other films were bad.
()
I haven't read the book, and I wasn't too impressed with the 80s movie, so I'm pleasantly surprised here. For the first time in a while, a mainstream horror film that doesn't try to be weird and controversial, but is very audience friendly (there are jump-scares and even blood), so as pure horror entertainment everything is on point here, as it should be. The actors are decent and there are thankfully no illogical missteps, visually it's an inoffensive standard and the horror scenes are effective. The finale is nicely atmospheric and uncompromising and the denouement is certainly a surprise. I'm satisfied. 80%.
()
I received the source material a few months before viewing it and out of the growing stack of Stephen King's books that I have read, this is definitely one of the scariest, if not the scariest, and certainly the most unpleasant, disturbing, and inducing of lingering nightmares. The adaptation logically shortens or simplifies many storylines, which is not a problem as long as it manages to take all the motifs far enough and lets the main characters get where they belong. In this spirit, I easily accept both the change of the central twist and the subsequent shortcuts in favor of tension. However, what I can't accept is the last approximately ten minutes, which, although effectively scary and frightening, are exactly the way the book never was. There a hint or a few glances, actions, and sentences were enough, and this gave rise to the ending, which I consider to be one of the best endings I have ever read. Unfortunately, the adaptation takes the opposite, more action-oriented path, but perhaps because I understand that the film medium is completely different from the literary one, especially in this genre, I am being more lenient in my rating. The mood that settled in my soul for months after reading, namely Jud's message about male hearts that are simply stonier, is also present here, although the viewer must actively seek it out.
()
Hirdetés